Classical Philosophers
Plotinus:
 or
we are not cut off from our source nor separated from it, even though
the bodily nature intervenes and draws us towards itself, but we breathe
and maintain our being in our source, which does not first give itself
and then withdraw, but is always supplying us, as long as it is what it
is. But we are more truth alive when we turn towards it, and in this lies
our well-being. To be far from it is isolation and diminution. In it our
soul rests, out of reach of evil; it has ascended to a region out of reach
of all evil; there it has a spiritual vision, and is exempt from passion
and suffering; there it truly lives. For our present life, without God,
is a mere shadow and mimicry of the true life.
--"The Enneads"
Socrates:
his
is what my God commands: Make your first concern not for your bodies nor
for your possessions, but for the highest welfare of your souls...Wealth
does not bring goodness, but goodness brings wealth and every other blessing.
--"Apology"
in The Last Days of Socrates recounted
by Plato
5th Century BC
Kierkegaard:
o
now with love. What love does, that it is; what it is, that it does--
and at one and the same time: at the very moment it goes out of itself
(the direction outward) it is in itself (the direction inward); and at
the very moment, it is in itself, it thereby goes out of itself -- so
that this outgoing and this return, this return and this outgoing, are
simultaneously one and the same.
When we say that "Love gives fearlessness,"
we mean by that, that the lover by his very nature makes others fearless;
wherever love is present, it spreads fearlessness; one freely approaches
the lover, for he drives out fear. Whereas the suspicious man frightens
everyone away from him, whereas the cunning and the crafty spread fear
and painful unrest about them, whereas the presence of the tyrant oppresses
like the heavy pressure of sultry air- love gives fearlessness. But when
we say that "love gives fearlessness," we also say at the same
time something else, that the lover has fearlessness, just as it is said
that love gives boldness on the day of judgment, that is, it makes the
lover fearless in the judgment.
...God is love, and when a man from love forgets himself, how then could
God forget him! No, while the lover forgets himself and thinks of the
other man, God thinks of the lover. The self-lover is busy, he shrieks
and shouts, and stands for his rights in order to make certain of not
being forgotten - and yet, he is forgotten; but the lover who forgets
himself, he is remembered by love. There is One who thinks of him, and
thereby it comes to pass that the lover gets what he gives.
-- "Love Covereth
A Multitude of Sins"
in A Kierkegaard Anthology
Martin Heidegger:
ecause
Dasein ( the Self) is lost in the "they", it must first find itself. In
order to find itself at all, it must be 'shown' to itself in its possible
authenticity. In terms of its possibility, Dasein is already a potentiality-for-Being-its-Self,
but it needs to have this potentiality attested.
As a phenomenon of Dasein, conscience is
not just a fact which occurs and is occasionally present-at-hand. It 'is'
only in Dasein's kind of being, and it makes itself known as a Fact only
with factical existence and in it.
To the call of conscience there corresponds
a possible hearing. Our understanding of the appeal unveils itself as
our wanting to have a conscience. If the everyday interpretation knows
a 'voice' of conscience…the 'voice' is taken rather as a giving-to-understand.
In the tendency to disclosure which belongs to the call, lies the momentum
of a push - of an abrupt arousal. The call is from afar unto afar. It
reaches him who wants to be brought back.
And to what is one called when one is thus
appealed to? To one's OWN SELF. …the call undoubtedly does not come from
someone else with me in the world. The call comes from me and yet from
beyond me and over me.
-- Being and Time
Giordano Bruno
ince
a finite is a finite through union with its limiting opposite at their
point of union, the Infinite must be that which can and does negate determination
and limitation itself, and by so doing returns into itself indifferently
and indeterminately all that is different and determinate. In this notion
of infinity the negation or opposition has not disappeared completely,
but has been incorporated within the Infinite and transcended by it. Infinity
as such, therefore, would in a sense become one with all it comprehends
in itself. The Infinite would thus be that which is its own "opposition,"
its own "determination," its own "end," and that which by its own nature
is a "negation" of any and all determinations- it would be that which
"determines" and "limits" itself. It would thus be self-determined, and
would be "in" itself. This Infinite which "determines" itself must be
self-sufficient, then, by definition, and at one and the same time have
within itself all the "limits" and "opposites" which would "exist" in
it as these finite determinations - determinations which are but particular
participating contractions of the infinite essence.
It is the Infinite that can by determining
itself return to itself, and while remaining one and self-sufficient reflect
its particular participations. Again, by this inner negation of all particulars
it necessarily becomes an affirmation of all of them, because the particular
participating limitations have coincided in the Infinite, and have an
existence as "related" to it.
-- The Infinite in
Giordano Bruno
Leo Tolstoy
ne
has but to understand Christ's teaching to understand that the world,
not that which God gave for man's delight but the world men have devised
for their own destruction, is a dream, and a very wild and terrible dream
- the raving of a maniac from which one need but awake in order never
to return to that, terrible nightmare."
-- Tolstoy's Confessions
Call to the Quest ||
Ancient Wisdom || Eastern
Masters || Classical
Philosophers || Poetic
Revelation
Asian Sages ||
Christian Mystics ||
Master Jesus || Out
of Time
Order
Videos & Publications ||
Contact
Us ||
Links
|